|
|
Post by Jenna Morasca on Aug 12, 2009 10:20:21 GMT -5
Congratz guys I just have a few things to say, my mind isnt made up yet.
well I never thought id be voting for two people who gave me their word to have voted me out straight away.
Rudy I want to know is why you tried to gun me down as soon as we merged, I was taken out of that immunity so fast, was it because I was a former winner or you just did'nt like me and I know I was stupid to have trusted you in the final 8 but when someone gives you immunity and promise them a spot in the final seven you don't vote them off that was a very bad move on your behalf.
Neleh, wow you are so good at telling people what they want to hear no matter how much of a lie it was. I just want you to know I also went through my season without recieving a single vote until the final which I won also I did'nt lie during my season so it is very easy to get through a season without telling lies. What you told me was false, I want to know was there any part of knowing you personaly between you and I that wasnt false.
I wanna know from both of you why I was the next person to be voted out.
Ok tell me which two jury members deserve to be sitting there instead of you two and which two jury members are the most least deserving of being in the final 2.
Hopefully your answers will make my mind up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rudy Boesch on Aug 12, 2009 11:05:11 GMT -5
That immunity when I took you out had nothing to do with me not liking you. I try not to play these games and let personal feelings get in the way. They do sometimes, but that was not the case here. It also had nothing to do with you being a former winner. In fact, that did not even cross my mind. What I was doing during that challenge was trying to win it, and I knew you to be a huge challenge threat. As bad as this may sound, I was thinking that it was one less person between me and immunity.
I knew you would bring up the final eight immunity, and I am glad you did. Like I said before, you should not have trusted me, though I did have every single intention of saving you that round. I even talked to my alliance about keeping you around at least one more round, but in the end, they were against it, saying that you were too big of a threat to allow to keep around too much longer. I did agree with them, but I also did want to honor my deal with you. But when it looked like there was no way that was going to happen, I had to do what was best for me and go along with them, not wanting to jeopardize my own position in the game at that stage of the game. I just want you to know that while you should not have trusted me, I DID make a honest effort to keep you that round. Looking back, perhaps I should not have promised you a spot in the final seven, but instead should have just promised you that I would at least try. Which I did. I am sorry for that. It just came down to the fact that I really wanted that immunity and that I was looking out for me, and my spot in the game.
Why were you the next person voted out? I touched on this a bit earlier, but you were seen as a huge threat and it was decided that it would be best that you not be around long enough to cause us a problem game wise. Also, you were simply on the outside of the alliance I was in.
The two jury members I think should be sitting here instead of us should be Yul and Iberhem, and I am not just saying this because they were in my alliance. Those two played a very strategic and social game, always thinking one or two steps ahead and could have very easily been here instead of Neleh and myself.
Two jury members that are least deserving? I hate answering these kinds of questions, since I like everyone, but if I had to choose, it would be Syd (I'm sorry Syd, you know I love you) since she did not seem as much into the game as the rest of us. I am very sorry if I am wrong about this, but that is the way it seemed to me. The other choice is just as tough, but I am going to have to say John, but ONLY because I did not see him play that much and did not get to know him as well as the rest of you. I am sure that this would be different if those two reasons were not in effect.
Thank you for your questions Jenna, and best of luck in your choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neleh Dennis on Aug 12, 2009 13:49:06 GMT -5
OK, so I guess I have to pick apart your statement in different ways to explain myself lol.
How is that so? I know I am good at talking to people, but I only lied twice in this game, and that was about having the hidden immunity idol and when I made the alliance with you and went back on it. So, I really wasn't going around just telling people what they wanted to hear. It's being made out to be I was this giant liar, when really I didn't lie much at all.
I'm glad to know you did that, however, I was told from others in this season (I honestly cannot remember specifically who) that you were very deceptive and deceiving during your season. Maybe we are similar in more ways than you think? I don't know if you're trying to educate me (which, by the way, I have also already won games without lying and not getting a single vote the entire season), or trying to get an apology out of me (which I already said in my Opening Statement), but okay.
This is kind of confusing to me...I don't get what you mean?Was there any part of knowing me personally between me and you that wasn't false? Yes, everything other than the alliance. The alliance was the only thing falsified with you, nothing I told you about me was false.
You were the next one voted out because after Brad left, we needed to choose someone else. Kelly had gone inactive and I was close with her from Season One (even though we had made an alliance, I was still closer with her than I was with you), so we were going to keep her around. Then, I found myself becoming very close with Rob C. and began looking at the game later down the line with him. I decided it was more to my advantage to have him here than to have you here. You were also the biggest threat at that time to our 5-person alliance when it came to the Immunity Challenges, and for that, you needed to go.
I feel that in this answer, Yul and Ibe could be interchangable with one another. Their games were so similar that they were almost one person. However, if I had to choose one, I would choose Yul. Yul made it farther, and I found Yul was the one trying to implement strategy more often than Ibe. Yul was the one that would come to me more like "let's do this", or "what about this next?", while Ibe and I talked more on a personal level. I think Yul was the bigger gamer.
For the second person, I would hands down choose Rob C. He went from being in the minority to finding a couple of people in the majority and regaining his position. Had he won the last two Immunity Challenges and fenagled his way into the Final 2, I think he would have (and deservingly so) won the entire game.
For this, it's hard, but I know who I would choose.
First, I would choose John K. Although it wasn't his fault he was voted out when he was due to the hospital issue, he originally wasn't even going to be a juror, and for that I would have to put him as one of the two.
For the other, I would choose Brad. Like I said, I think Brad had great potential to be a great player in this game, but he even admitted to me on multiple occasions in this game that his head wasn't completely in the game due to things going on in personal life and with the end of school. He was too busy and didn't have the time/energy/strategy to invest in it that he needed. If he was around more, he maybe could have done major damage.
I know some might argue that Syd should be here, and while she did go a bit inactive at times, when she was around, she DID make the moves she needed to further advance herself in the game, and she continued to communicate with me and Rudy which saved her on a few occasions, so I don't think she would be in the bottom 2 least deserving.
|
|
|
|
Post by brad on Aug 12, 2009 21:15:24 GMT -5
|
|
